W Zmowie, czyli duet warszawiaków 1z2 oraz RDS jest znów w akcji. Tym razem chłopaki zaprezentują nam maxi singiel zatytułowany "Jestem..." Już dziś mamy tytułowy kawałek.
Ostatnia produkcja dwóch raperów z Warszawy nosi tytuł Kilkaset
Słów, Kilkaset Sekund Sławy i pojawiło się na niej sporo
mainstreamowych wykonawców takich jak PIH, Eldo, czy Fu.
W kawałku Jestem... mamy natomiast, jeszcze mało znanego
gościa, rapera z Gostynina o pseudonimie Kama. Chłopak nie jest może zaliczany
do najpopularniejszych raperów, ale właśnie z takimi nagrywa kawałki. Na jego
jedynym jak na razie krążku zatytułowanym 2 Oddech pojawił się
między innymi PIH oraz Ekonom, reprezentant Fenomenu.
Wracając do meritum sprawy, czyli do tytułowego utworu promującego nowy
maxi singiel autorstwa 1z2 i RDS'a. Posłuchajcie W zmowie feat. Kama -
Jestem...
Granted; and thank you for your thoughtful cmeomnt.And, Mr. White, et. al., have realized their respective financial successes in capitalistic systems, which Dr. Farmer (as a Marxist) disavows due to the inequality he perceives. It is in the capitalistic system, where there is equality of opportunity, as opposed to equality of results, where wealth accumulation (and subsequent charitable generosity) becomes possible.
hOIAbldEPPfuQdCkFg
Erich:-Interplast spends 37% on orhveead (see ). It\'s 3-star this year, was 2-star last year.-One of the many random arbitrary properties of the Straw Ratio (and other Charity Navigator metrics) is a tendency to favor larger organizations. The central administration (which a good accountant will count as the only orhveead ) doesn\'t tend to grow at the same rate as program. We tend to evaluate very large charities, so nearly everyone we evaluate does well on these metrics, a fact that has nothing to do with their quality of the quality of the metrics.-Across the board, we see what we feel is insufficient self-evaluation and -documentation, even for our best charities. Across the board, we are told that this arises out of a desire to keep orhveead low. I believe it is simply not possible, in today\'s environment, for a charity to ignore this issue and spend as much on orhveead as it should. This is another reason that the fact that our top charities manage to come out with low orhveead ratios does not make the point you seem to think it makes.-I put it to you that you don\'t seem very interested in genuine dialogue. I tried to discuss these issues with you on Tactical Philanthropy, but you ignored me and then mentioned my comments in a sideways fashion on another thread; I didn\'t get an email alert of the response and now I can\'t even find your comment. Your rigid empiricism frankly seems rhetorical rather than genuine: we have always advocated a combination of logic and data, but you seem to ignore all the analysis we\'ve made freely available about what our recommended charities do and why we like them better than others, instead pointing to correlations between our rankings and Straw Ratio rankings drawn from a sample size of 4. I\'ve fully disclosed my background, and made clear that I have no ulterior motives in fighting the overuse of these metrics. At this point I am curious about your background. Google tells me you are affiliated with a charitable foundation, so you presumably have a history of doing evaluation yourself. May I ask whether you have made heavy use of these metrics in the past? I\'ll be frank: I wonder whether you have a history of decisions that you have a psychological motive to defend.
